Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 6:28:15 GMT -4
The could return full HTML for those pages in response to new requests for each URL and that the back button was handled correctly by your JavaScript. Along the way in my opinion too many sites got distracted by a separate prerendering step. This is an approach that does the equivalent of running a headless browser to generate static HTML pages that include any changes made by JavaScript on page load then serving those snapshots instead of the JSreliant page in response to requests from bots.
It typically treats bots differently in a way that Google tolerates as Greece Mobile Number List long as the snapshots do represent the user experience. In my opinion this approach is a poor compromise thats too susceptible to silent failures and falling out of date. Weve seen a bunch of sites suffer traffic drops due to serving Googlebot broken experiences that were not immediately detected because no regular users saw the prerendered pages. These days if you need or want JSenhanced functionality more of the top frameworks have the ability to work the way Rob described in which is now called isomorphic roughly meaning the same.
Isomorphic JavaScript serves HTML that corresponds to the rendered DOM for each URL and updates the URL for each view that should exist as a separate page as the content is updated via JS. With this implementation there is actually no need to render the page to index basic content as its served in response to any fresh request. I was fascinated by this piece of research published recently you should go and read the whole study. In particular you should watch this video recommended in the post in which the speaker who is an the need for an isomorphic approach Resources for auditing JavaScript If you work in SEO you will increasingly find yourself called upon to figure out whether a particular implementation is correct hopefully on a stagingdevelopment.
It typically treats bots differently in a way that Google tolerates as Greece Mobile Number List long as the snapshots do represent the user experience. In my opinion this approach is a poor compromise thats too susceptible to silent failures and falling out of date. Weve seen a bunch of sites suffer traffic drops due to serving Googlebot broken experiences that were not immediately detected because no regular users saw the prerendered pages. These days if you need or want JSenhanced functionality more of the top frameworks have the ability to work the way Rob described in which is now called isomorphic roughly meaning the same.
Isomorphic JavaScript serves HTML that corresponds to the rendered DOM for each URL and updates the URL for each view that should exist as a separate page as the content is updated via JS. With this implementation there is actually no need to render the page to index basic content as its served in response to any fresh request. I was fascinated by this piece of research published recently you should go and read the whole study. In particular you should watch this video recommended in the post in which the speaker who is an the need for an isomorphic approach Resources for auditing JavaScript If you work in SEO you will increasingly find yourself called upon to figure out whether a particular implementation is correct hopefully on a stagingdevelopment.